Monorepo for Tangled tangled.org

proposal: use did for knot reference #293

closed opened by boltless.me

Currently we use knot hostname to reference a knot in atproto records.

I suggest to use did (more specifically did:web) instead. It's common pattern in atproto to use did:web to reference a service (e.g. bluesky feedgen);

Closing this issue. With #335: proposal: remove sh.tangled.*.member lexicons and did-for-repo proposal, we won't reference the knot from atproto records anymore.

In short-term, we can remove all lexicons referencing the knot excluding the sh.tangled.repo and in long-term, we will move to an architecture where each repositories have their own DID which has knot registered as a service in DID doc.

sign up or login to add to the discussion
Labels

None yet.

area

None yet.

assignee

None yet.

Participants 1
AT URI
at://did:plc:xasnlahkri4ewmbuzly2rlc5/sh.tangled.repo.issue/3m5docaw5vg22