Currently we use knot hostname to reference a knot in atproto records.
I suggest to use did (more specifically did:web) instead. It's common pattern in atproto to use did:web to reference a service (e.g. bluesky feedgen);
Currently we use knot hostname to reference a knot in atproto records.
I suggest to use did (more specifically did:web) instead. It's common pattern in atproto to use did:web to reference a service (e.g. bluesky feedgen);
Closing this issue. With #335: proposal: remove
sh.tangled.*.memberlexicons and did-for-repo proposal, we won't reference the knot from atproto records anymore.In short-term, we can remove all lexicons referencing the knot excluding the
sh.tangled.repoand in long-term, we will move to an architecture where each repositories have their own DID which has knot registered as a service in DID doc.